FB Posts


Check out this article from FiveThirtyEight 📈

On March 26, challengers to North Carolina’s congressional map will argue before the Supreme Court that it is a partisan gerrymander — that is, the district boundaries were drawn to benefit one political party, the GOP, in a way that violates the Constitution.

The challengers are using a variety of quantitative tools to make their argument, including a metric called “partisan bias” that tries to evaluate how skewed a map is by looking at the number of seats a party would have won in a hypothetical election in which the vote was evenly split between Republicans and Democrats. Here’s an article that shows how that metric works.


One Way To Spot A Partisan Gerrymander

Will a metric called “partisan bias” convince the Supreme Court that the North Carolina congressional map is a partisan gerrymander?

See our original post at Facebook

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Post comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.